<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>EthicalFan - Latest Comments</title><link>http://ethicalfan.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://ethicalfan.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Feb 2014 22:20:30 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The Copyleft</title><link>http://ethicalfan.com/the-copyleft/#comment-1237619192</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"What then is Mr. Barlow referring to when he says zero cost?"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If at all, ISPs profit the most from so-called "piracy". As you've seen in those incredible numbers, an extreme amount of data traffic stems from duplicated "intellectual property". If they lost those numbers, the ISPs would be in serious problems.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I have some projects going on (non-activist) regarding finding solutions to the new century's big Internet topics, but you'd understand that I won't share my identity here where the risk of getting associated with criminal intents is simply too high. ("Ethicalfan" basically screams "problems".)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I hope we won't see too big of an apocalypse once the revolution goes into the next phase, because our economy is really interwoven and I think it'd be damaging if all those old companies and corporations couldn't find the tempo to keep up with technological changes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sincerely.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Veryon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Feb 2014 22:20:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Torrent Freak: US BitTorrent Traffic Grows 40% from 2011 (Sandvine)</title><link>http://ethicalfan.com/2012/11/torrent-freak-bittorrent-traffic-grows-40-2011-sandvine/#comment-1237612903</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's harmful to progress, growth, creativity and much more if we have censorship and look at "piracy" as a criminal act. Furthermore, any criminal act must be understood in its motivations, and if you set the price for a loaf of bread at $1'000.-, you will get criminals. It is too late to try to set up an Internet police. People are already in a later phase of the revolution. It's inevitable.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Veryon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Feb 2014 22:11:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Copyleft</title><link>http://ethicalfan.com/the-copyleft/#comment-1220299900</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow I'm waiting for moderation so the one who thinks my ideas should be mine doesn't want them to exist in vicinity of his own :/ Ethics does not require government it is quite the opposite.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thaicares</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2014 11:52:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Copyleft</title><link>http://ethicalfan.com/the-copyleft/#comment-1132181519</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I've said this for ages, I don't mind buying a digital copy of something as long as the artists get something for it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'd rather have a physical thing, or be able to attend a concert.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;All I want are 'Audiophile' quality files, I can appreciate as much as a CD or Vinyl Record.&lt;br&gt;Thanks for this perspective.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Simon Bellord</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2013 22:44:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: EFF Agenda Theories</title><link>http://ethicalfan.com/2012/04/eff-agenda/#comment-941601406</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The concept of recruiting uploaders to do the initial theft is pretty funny (in a tragic way). Is Hotfire the Fagin for the 21st century? &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fagin" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fagin"&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">nevilleelder</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 10:57:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: EFF Agenda Theories</title><link>http://ethicalfan.com/2012/04/eff-agenda/#comment-937049136</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"in our opinion"?..."appear to be"?...aren't you being a little soft on these crims? They are masters at fraud and skirting around policies intended to keep them from doing what they are, IN FACT, doing. As an independant "content creator" that believes in our copyright system, I've loved your blog. We don't have to pussyfoot with these assholes anymore. Call them out for what they are: Thieves. :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 18:37:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Calling All Lawyers! uTorrent Increases &amp;#8220;Privacy&amp;#8221; and Counters Mass-Monitoring of Downloads</title><link>http://ethicalfan.com/2012/09/calling-lawyers-utorrent-increases-privacy-counters-mass-monitoring-downloads/#comment-772399968</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There exists no feasible method for content owners to police a home video cassette recorder. There was no feasible method to prevent kids (I include myself) in the era of Cassettes from dubbing them. Here is how it worked for us kids in 1995: I bought the Metallica Black Album and my friend bought Ozzmosis, and we each had a stack of blank cassettes and a dual cassette deck. It took one hour to dub one hour of music. We borrowed each other's music like crazy. We could either trade tapes or listen to a very limited selection of music because we didn't have a ton of cash laying around to each buy our OWN copy of EVERYTHING. The record companies didn't lose revenue--when faced with the option of purchasing every album we ever heard or doing without, we did without. I think you'll find the same principal today.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">David</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 04:18:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Torrent Freak: US BitTorrent Traffic Grows 40% from 2011 (Sandvine)</title><link>http://ethicalfan.com/2012/11/torrent-freak-bittorrent-traffic-grows-40-2011-sandvine/#comment-755094660</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://documents.envisional.com/docs/Envisional-Internet_Usage-Jan2011.pdf" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://documents.envisional.com/docs/Envisional-Internet_Usage-Jan2011.pdf"&gt;http://documents.envisional...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ethicalfan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 20:04:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Torrent Freak: US BitTorrent Traffic Grows 40% from 2011 (Sandvine)</title><link>http://ethicalfan.com/2012/11/torrent-freak-bittorrent-traffic-grows-40-2011-sandvine/#comment-743940058</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Kickstarter is not a new "model".  Kickstarter is regression to patronage - artists relying on charity.  Copyright creates wealth for individuals and drives investment.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ethicalfan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 13:40:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Torrent Freak: US BitTorrent Traffic Grows 40% from 2011 (Sandvine)</title><link>http://ethicalfan.com/2012/11/torrent-freak-bittorrent-traffic-grows-40-2011-sandvine/#comment-732017902</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"On the music side, pro-piracy advocates are working hard to feature artists who don’t mind if their recordings are distributed for free.  If you search the top torrents by distributors (seeders) you see that most of the top 10 on that list are “legal".&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That's a positive thing, surely?  And why the scare quotes around "legal"?  It's binary.  Things are either legal or not.  It's not down to your personal opinion of the sites in question.  You can argue that the sites are unethical or untrustworthy, but that isn't the same thing.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That said, I'm highly cynical about this development.  It's my view this is a marketing ploy by the Pirate Bay, not something driven by any commitment to music or DIY culture.  (Let alone digital snake oil salesmen like Kim Dotcom).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Part of the issue is that the sites in question have such prominence that many artists don't really get that there are other options.  It's seen as a choice between this or selling your soul to the music industry.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And people like you have helped that situation.  By failing to publicise alternatives to the old models (Kickstarter isn't even on your links list and they're obvious), you have contributed to that situation.  Despite your opposition to the Pirate Bay, you have actively strengthened their hand on this matter.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Worse, you link to sites like Amazon without a word of criticism.  (Apparently tax avoidance, union busting and appalling working conditions are ok with an "ethical fan").   Same with Spotify (who are, in collusion with the major labels to pay indie labels who aren't on Merlin far less money they they should be getting.  But, of course, that's the major record labels screwing over musicians, so that's not your problem.  Spotify also refuse to allow unsigned bands on their site, which is obviously in the interests of the labels).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As an ethical fan, why don't you do an investigation into the claims that Sony are using sweatshops?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;To counter the current publicity stunt by the pirate sites, we need to do more than going "piracy is bad" and telling people to trust the system that has screwed over so many musicians.  (Some of whom are personal friends of mine).  We need to push for a genuine alternative to both.  More ethical.  More credible.  More utopian.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sam Flintlock</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2012 22:03:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What To Do</title><link>http://ethicalfan.com/what-to-do/#comment-708700640</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Email journalists who write highly biased and inaccurate articles about your industry."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Like you...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Zach Howe</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 20:35:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wozniak, Megaupload and Kim Dotcom</title><link>http://ethicalfan.com/2012/06/wozniak-megaupload-and-kim-dot-com/#comment-708696097</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"But we feel that his statements and photograph with Kim Dotcom really illustrate the blind spot that many skilled and ethical technologists have regarding the rights of creative people and the preventable harm that some internet technology is doing to them."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If we want to talk about blind spots lets talk about how infeasible request to filter content automatically. Not to mention the censorship implications this would have. You guys love free speech, I get that. Problem is, you're willing to sacrifice it to save your personal pocketbooks. You should call yourself the "un-ethical fan" in that case.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Zach Howe</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 20:26:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Torrent Freak: US BitTorrent Traffic Grows 40% from 2011 (Sandvine)</title><link>http://ethicalfan.com/2012/11/torrent-freak-bittorrent-traffic-grows-40-2011-sandvine/#comment-708692684</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Pro-piracy advocates say that we just need to accept piracy and that artists need to get a new business model.  This is false.  The $400B US telecom industry needs to follow the law."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;New business models need to happen. Piracy won't go away with any law. Stop misleading people into thinking otherwise. Piracy cannot be stopped. Sooner or later you will have to accept it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Zach Howe</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 20:20:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Torrent Freak: US BitTorrent Traffic Grows 40% from 2011 (Sandvine)</title><link>http://ethicalfan.com/2012/11/torrent-freak-bittorrent-traffic-grows-40-2011-sandvine/#comment-705990011</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice article on a terrible subject. Do you have a link to the envisional study by any chance?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Stefan&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stefan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 05:36:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Calling All Lawyers! uTorrent Increases &amp;#8220;Privacy&amp;#8221; and Counters Mass-Monitoring of Downloads</title><link>http://ethicalfan.com/2012/09/calling-lawyers-utorrent-increases-privacy-counters-mass-monitoring-downloads/#comment-659706135</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It would be great if you would mention the reasons to randomize the peer-id other than avoiding law enforcement.  It's been a feature of BitTorrent at least since 2006&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ethicalfan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2012 04:21:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Calling All Lawyers! uTorrent Increases &amp;#8220;Privacy&amp;#8221; and Counters Mass-Monitoring of Downloads</title><link>http://ethicalfan.com/2012/09/calling-lawyers-utorrent-increases-privacy-counters-mass-monitoring-downloads/#comment-658698462</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The feature for peer ID randomization is opt in. The end user has to enable it, and there are legitimate reasons as to why one might want to randomize their peer ID. It's not ALL about protecting the people who commit copyright infringement. You make this feature out to be bad, when it's not. And if you're going to run a blog, might be a smart idea to change up the categories. Looks unprofessional to have the default "uncategorized" category. Just saying. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Degnee @ Reddit</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2012 02:54:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What To Do</title><link>http://ethicalfan.com/what-to-do/#comment-653646788</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Try reading a book written by an actual economist;  &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.com/The-Invisible-Hook-Economics-Pirates/dp/0691137471" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.amazon.com/The-Invisible-Hook-Economics-Pirates/dp/0691137471"&gt;http://www.amazon.com/The-I...&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As opposed to that shit you're 'recommending' on the side-bar.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SnarkyLibertarian</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 18:54:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Legal Sites</title><link>http://ethicalfan.com/sample-page/#comment-599238831</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The amount of illegal stuff on the "legal" site Youtube is just staggering. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DIDI</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 00:20:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Watch Pirate Movies and Play Games On Your TV for $99</title><link>http://ethicalfan.com/2012/07/watch-pirate-movies-play-games-tv-99/#comment-588155203</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The creative people should go on collective strike. That is now our only option; our last resort. We feed all the individuals that cash in millions on our backs...why? IF we would stop the supply, THEY would be out of THEIR "job" and THEIR "business" would be meaningless. Sadly no one will dare to participate, but sadder even is that this is meaningless as most pros will be forced to quit and many of them are quitting right now. It IS happening. It's like the Greenpeace folks say: "Only after the last......only then will you realize......."  :-/&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Hunkey Dorey</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2012 20:48:37 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>